True or False: An investigator must have compelling evidence before violating a person's privacy.

The statement is accurate because investigators generally need to justify any intrusions into an individual’s privacy with compelling evidence or a legitimate investigative purpose. Privacy is a fundamental right that is often protected by various legal standards, and violating it without sufficient cause can lead to ethical issues and potential legal consequences.

In practice, compelling evidence must often outweigh a person's right to privacy, particularly in cases involving sensitive information or situations where individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Investigative practices must therefore be guided by a clear necessity for the information being sought, ensuring that the methods used are both ethical and legally permissible. This requirement helps maintain public trust in the investigative process and upholds individual rights.

Understanding this principle is crucial for anyone engaged in investigative work, as it underscores the importance of balancing the need for information with the rights of individuals.